
Free
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date December 2, 1903
-
Sectors Audio
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 8
Company Description
Generative Artificial Intelligence
Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language designs (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with many smaller sized firms have established generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]
Generative AI has utilizes throughout a vast array of industries, consisting of software application development, healthcare, financing, entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] style, [18] and product design. [19] However, issues have been raised about the potential abuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using fake news or deepfakes to trick or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Intellectual property law concerns also exist around generative designs that are trained on and emulate copyrighted artworks. [22]
Early history
Since its beginning, scientists in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of creating synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these problems have actually previously been checked out by misconception, fiction and viewpoint given that antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art dates back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where innovators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having developed devices capable of composing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of innovative automations has actually grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been utilized to model natural languages since their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]
Academic expert system
The scholastic discipline of synthetic intelligence was developed at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced numerous waves of development and optimism in the years considering that. [31] Expert system research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have actually used expert system to create artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and displaying generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen developed to produce paintings. [32]
The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were used in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, specifically computer-aided process preparation, used to create series of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI methods such as state space search and restraint fulfillment and were a “fairly mature” innovation by the early 1990s. They were utilized to produce crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] process prepare for producing [33] and choice strategies such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]
Generative neural nets (2014-2019)
Since its beginning, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative models and generative models, to design and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove development and research in image classification, speech recognition, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this era were usually trained as discriminative designs, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]
In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks capable of finding out generative designs, instead of discriminative ones, for complex information such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not just class labels for images but also whole images.
In 2017, the Transformer network enabled developments in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] causing the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), understood as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize not being watched to various jobs as a Structure model. [40]
The brand-new generative designs presented throughout this duration enabled large neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision learning or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the supervised knowing common of discriminative designs. Unsupervised knowing removed the need for people to manually label data, enabling for larger networks to be trained. [41]
Generative AI boom (2020-)
In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a complimentary web application that could produce persuading character voices using very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI technology. [43] [44]
In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to top quality synthetic intelligence art creation from natural language triggers. [46] These systems demonstrated unmatched abilities in creating photorealistic images, art work, and designs based on text descriptions, leading to extensive adoption among artists, designers, and the public.
In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT changed the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to participate in natural conversations, generate innovative material, help with coding, and perform different analytical tasks caught worldwide attention and stimulated widespread conversation about AI’s possible effect on work, education, and creativity. [48]
In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be deemed an early (yet still incomplete) variation of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who maintained that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the criteria of ‘general human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design combining several modalities including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D data, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]
In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model offered in 4 versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google merged Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, introducing a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]
In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of big language designs, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed significant enhancements in abilities across different benchmarks, with Claude 3 Opus notably outperforming leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]
According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has emerged as a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]
Modalities
A generative AI system is constructed by applying without supervision device knowing (conjuring up for instance neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine learning trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend upon the method or type of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]
Text
Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They can natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be used as foundation models for other jobs. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).
Code
In addition to natural language text, large language designs can be trained on programming language text, allowing them to create source code for brand-new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]
Images
Producing top quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are frequently used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).
Audio
Generative AI can also be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which showed the capability to clone character voices using as little as 15 seconds of training data. [67] The website gained extensive attention for its ability to generate mentally expressive speech for various fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives subsequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]
Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of documented music together with text annotations, in order to produce new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.
Music
Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been generated, like the tune Savages, which utilized AI to simulate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]
Many AI music generators have actually been produced that can be produced utilizing a text phrase, category alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]
Video
Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]
Actions
Generative AI can likewise be trained on the movements of a robotic system to produce new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research uses triggers like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out rudimentary thinking in response to user prompts and visual input, such as choosing up a toy dinosaur when given the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]
3D modeling
Artificially smart computer-aided style (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could also be developed using linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help simplify workflow. [82]
Software and hardware
Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image products such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have been integrated into a variety of existing commercially readily available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise readily available as open-source software application, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.
Smaller generative AI models with as much as a couple of billion specifications can operate on mobile phones, embedded devices, and personal computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion criteria) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can work on an iPhone 11. [90]
Larger models with tens of billions of criteria can run on laptop computer or home computer. To accomplish an acceptable speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon products. For instance, the 65 billion parameter variation of LLaMA can be configured to run on a desktop PC. [91]
The advantages of running generative AI locally include security of privacy and intellectual property, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That online forum is among just 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI safety. [95]
Language designs with hundreds of billions of parameters, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, generally run on datacenter computer systems equipped with arrays of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are usually accessed as cloud services online.
In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.
There is complimentary software on the market capable of recognizing text created by generative artificial intelligence (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation methods for identifying generative AI content consist of digital watermarking, material authentication, information retrieval, and maker knowing classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of precision, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have actually regularly produced incorrect positives, mistakenly accusing students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]
Law and regulation
In the United States, a group of business including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to require all US companies to report information to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI models. [104] [105]
In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to reveal copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]
In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, guidelines on training information and label quality, limitations on personal information collection, and a standard that generative AI should “adhere to socialist core values”. [108] [109]
Copyright
Training with copyrighted material
Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, openly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is safeguarded under fair use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]
Proponents of reasonable use training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]
Since 2024, numerous suits associated with making use of copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has taken legal action against Stability AI over the use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]
Copyright of AI-generated content
A separate concern is whether AI-generated works can qualify for copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by artificial intelligence with no human input can not be copyrighted, because they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has also started taking public input to figure out if these guidelines require to be for generative AI. [117]
Concerns
The development of generative AI has raised issues from governments, businesses, and individuals, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by several federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has huge capacity for good and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge international development” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, however that its destructive use “could cause dreadful levels of death and destruction, prevalent injury, and deep psychological damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]
Job losses
From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have actually been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computers in fact must be done by them, offered the difference between computer systems and human beings, and between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the tasks for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “expert system presents an existential hazard to imaginative occupations” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a potential challenge to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]
The intersection of AI and employment issues among underrepresented groups globally remains a vital element. While AI promises effectiveness improvements and skill acquisition, issues about job displacement and biased recruiting processes continue among these groups, as detailed in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive actions incorporate mitigating biases, promoting openness, respecting personal privacy and approval, and welcoming varied teams and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve rerouting policy emphasis on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s potential for tailored mentor to make the most of benefits while decreasing damages. [126]
Racial and gender predisposition
Generative AI designs can show and amplify any cultural bias present in the underlying information. For example, a language design might assume that doctors and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases are common in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text “a picture of a CEO” might disproportionately produce pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased data set. A variety of approaches for reducing bias have actually been tried, such as modifying input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]
Deepfakes
Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness utilizing artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually amassed widespread attention and issues for their uses in deepfake star pornographic videos, revenge porn, fake news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial fraud, and concealed foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited reactions from both market and federal government to find and restrict their use. [140] [141]
In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]
In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed ledger technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and use”. [144]
Audio deepfakes
Instances of users abusing software application to generate questionable declarations in the singing style of stars, public authorities, and other popular individuals have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually stated that they would deal with mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]
Concerns and fandoms have spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software application used to clone voices has been used on popular artists’ voices to create songs that simulate their voices, getting both incredible popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar strategies have likewise been used to produce improved quality or full-length variations of tunes that have actually been leaked or have yet to be launched. [155]
Generative AI has actually likewise been utilized to develop new digital artist characters, with a few of these receiving sufficient attention to receive record offers at major labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have also faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also developing artists which develop impractical or unethical appeals to their audiences. [157]
Cybercrime
Generative AI’s capability to develop realistic fake content has actually been made use of in various types of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to produce disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being perfectly practical, they would stop appearing amazing to audiences, possibly leading to uncritical approval of incorrect details. [159] Additionally, big language designs and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to create phony reviews of e-commerce sites to enhance ratings. [160] Cybercriminals have created large language models concentrated on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]
A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, making it possible for enemies to acquire assist with harmful requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety restrictions at low cost. [163]
Reliance on market giants
Training frontier AI models needs a huge amount of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech business have the funds to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]
Energy and environment
Scientists and reporters have expressed concerns about the ecological effect that the advancement and release of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big amounts of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electricity usage. [170] [166] [171] There is also concern that these impacts may increase as these designs are incorporated into widely used search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be retrained. [170]
Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring possible ecological expenses prior to model development or data collection, [165] increasing efficiency of information centers to lower electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more efficient machine learning models, [168] [166] [169] decreasing the variety of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] establishing a government-directed framework for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] managing for transparency of these designs, [167] controling their energy and water use, [168] motivating scientists to publish information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject experts who understand both artificial intelligence and climate science. [167]
Content quality
The New York Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: “substandard or undesirable A.I. material in social networks, art, books and … in search results.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed issues about the scale of low-grade generated content with respect to social media content moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social networks companies to spread out such content, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased time and effort to discover greater quality or preferred content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]
A paper released by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of websites, were maker equated. Much of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were equated across a minimum of 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]
In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that computed word frequencies based upon text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped updating the information for several reasons: high expenses for acquiring data from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing neighborhood, which “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]
The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in a surge of AI-generated material across several domains. A research study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely written with LLM assistance. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, around 17.5% of freshly published computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer review text now incorporate content produced by LLMs. [183]
Visual material follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have actually been produced daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been created utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these developed by models based on Stable Diffusion. [184]
If AI-generated material is consisted of in new information crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI designs, defects in the resulting designs might occur. [185] Training an AI model solely on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive deterioration and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after several iterations. [186] Tests have been performed with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with pictures of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the worth of data gathered from real human interactions with systems might end up being significantly valuable in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.
On the other side, synthetic information is typically utilized as an option to data produced by real-world occasions. Such information can be deployed to verify mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence designs while maintaining user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The approach is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer vision designs. [190]
Misuse in journalism
In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been using a concealed internal AI tool to write a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]
In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a fake AI-generated interview with former racing motorist Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks because 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “deceptively genuine”, and the interview consisted of a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter in the middle of the debate. [192]
Other outlets that have published short articles whose material and/or byline have been verified or thought to be created by generative AI designs – often with incorrect content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – include:
– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]
In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce short articles for many of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had produced tens of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]
News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, prompting issues about job losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have also been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]
In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce news stories” based upon input data offered, such as “details of existing occasions”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for granted the effort that went into producing precise and artful news stories.” [224]
In February 2024, Google introduced a program to pay little publishers to compose 3 articles daily utilizing a beta generative AI design. The program does not require the understanding or permission of the websites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it need the released articles to be identified as being produced or helped by these designs. [225]
Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]
United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed concern that generative AI could have a hazardous influence on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies creating a reliance for these news outlets. [235]
Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which sums up newspaper article, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly further reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]
In response to possible mistakes around the usage and abuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over declining audience trust, outlets all over the world, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually released standards around how they prepare to utilize and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]
In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “mostly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “generally human with some aid from AI”. The outcomes of worldwide surveys reported that people were more uncomfortable with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), crime (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]
Computer programming website
Technology website
Artificial general intelligence – Kind of AI with wide-ranging abilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that replicates conversation
Computational imagination – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Kind of big language model
Large language model – Kind of device learning design
Music and expert system – Usage of synthetic intelligence to generate music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is developed algorithmically rather than manually
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of info retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in maker knowing
References
^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, businesses, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, retrieved January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ fight versus AI, people win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation refilled? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Artificial Intelligence. New York City, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Quick History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted process preparation: the cutting edge survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a traditional generative AI planner based on the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control element is a standard spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural component clearly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine knowing: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are without supervision multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with without supervision learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some form because ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates plausible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates six types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google introduces Gemini-an effective AI design it says can go beyond GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI model – and a clever new way to connect with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Live.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and dangers of structure models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Buying Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “high-quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers described in a paper the ethical challenges that they encountered around the development of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer triggers dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI“. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design develop times with brand-new AI-driven part creation approach|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as start-up Runway reveals brand-new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is fundamental. Runway states it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of business software … the new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in some of the business’s most popular service apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function simply got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting an upgraded, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert adventure”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most essential features for creative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill function in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and use Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you desire to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4″. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created in your area, so you do not need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model at Home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design in the house, you will require a computer build with a powerful GPU that can deal with the big quantity of data and calculation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I quite much only trust two LLM evals today” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to halt sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with strict U.S. export requirements that limit how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 totally free software application to recognise fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be difficult. That’s a big problem for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI material for safety, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI“. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first regulation on synthetic intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers choose harder AI guidelines as draft relocate to final phase”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI rules to use only to items for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise welcoming the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office desires to hear what individuals consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is currently taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market apparently annihilated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring an agreement that explicitly demands AI policies to protect authors and the works they produce. … The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be used to change labor-has end up being a vital sticking point for stars going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently called SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system postures an existential danger to innovative professions, and all actors and performers deserve contract language that safeguards them from having their identity and talent made use of without permission and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the world are stressed over AI being a hazard to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are biased. Can logic help conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and enhancing safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the challenges of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech might begin a worldwide showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran use AI to boost anti-U.S. influence projects, authorities state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative innovations: Proposing the combination of expert system and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say specialists”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to take on deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to generate celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake celebrity audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Just Because AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare yourself for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ forecasts the greatest danger is that deepfakes will eventually become uninteresting”. Business Insider. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake evaluations: can we trust what we checked out online as usage of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it suggests for environment change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The newest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was manageable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs generate text that masquerades as real language with objective behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output surface everywhere,” she wrote. She provides the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dig,” in such a way that people do not, which has actually tossed off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively generated information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in majority of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was actually AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today site. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab a/c “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI post about women’s usage of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What remains in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news sites is publishing AI-written short articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter captured using artificial intelligence to develop phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will upgrade AI function after unreliable news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are surprised to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might result in ‘destruction’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s method to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.